Wage Trends 2026: What US Pay Data Shows Right Now
US wage trends for 2026: where pay growth stands, what employers budget, how raises compare with inflation and where to check real BLS wage data.
By the Salary Atlas editorial team · Published

US wage growth in 2026 is steady but unspectacular. Pay is still rising in nominal terms, at roughly 3% to 3.5% depending on the measure, but the gains are small enough that inflation can erase them. Employers plan to give raises near the same level as last year, and they are handing them out more selectively. Below, we separate what the data shows from what forecasters expect, and explain how to read any wage number you come across.
TL;DR
- Employers' planned base-pay increases for 2026 hold at a 3.5% median, the same as 2025.
- The Atlanta Fed's tracker, updated October 8, 2026, shows job stayers at 3.4% and job switchers at 4.7%, so the gap between staying and moving remains.
- Federal Reserve advisers and the San Francisco Fed see pay normalizing near 3%, with real purchasing power gaining little at best.
- Raises are becoming targeted: in-demand roles and strong performers get more, and across-the-board increases get smaller.
- Use national averages as a starting point only. Occupation, state and percentile change the answer far more than the national trend does.
Table of Contents
- Where wage growth stands in October 2026
- What employers plan to pay
- Do raises keep up with inflation?
- The "normalization" story
- Why raises are becoming selective
- Which sectors have room to raise pay
- Minimum wages are rising on a different track
- What we think
- How to use wage trends in your own decisions
- Wage data you can check yourself
- What to watch for the rest of 2026
- FAQ
- Sources
Where wage growth stands in October 2026
No single number describes "wage growth." Different agencies measure different things: the pay of a fixed set of workers, average hourly earnings across all jobs, or what employers budget for next year. They can differ by a full percentage point and still all be accurate.
The most useful cross-check for individual workers is the Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker. It follows the median percent change in the hourly wage of the same people over time, using Current Population Survey microdata. Because it follows individuals rather than averaging across a changing mix of jobs, it is less distorted when low-wage workers leave or enter the workforce.
In its October 8, 2026 update, the tracker showed workers who stayed in their jobs slipping from 3.6% to 3.4%. Workers who changed jobs went from 5.0% to 4.7%. Both groups cooled slightly, but job switchers still out-earned stayers by more than a percentage point.
The Economic Policy Institute's nominal wage tracker lists year-over-year growth for private employees at 3.1%, a slightly lower reading from a different data series. Read together, these point to a 3% to 3.5% range for typical nominal pay growth.
Why the numbers differ
- Who is counted. Trackers that follow the same individuals behave differently from those that compare averages across all jobs.
- Hourly versus weekly. Average weekly pay also depends on hours worked, so a cut in hours can pull it down even when hourly rates rise.
- Nominal versus real. Nominal wages are the dollars on your paycheck. Real wages adjust for inflation. The second is what you can actually buy.
- Timing. Monthly figures are noisy and get revised. A single month rarely changes the trend.
What employers plan to pay
Surveys of employer budgets show what raises are likely to look like for people who stay put. The Conference Board's 40th US Salary Increase Budgets survey found that 2026 increases are expected to hold near the 3.5% median reported for 2025. That is not a return to the exceptional raises of the post-pandemic years, but it is a steady, ordinary level.
A 3.5% median does not mean every employee gets 3.5%. It is the midpoint of the budgets. Roughly half of employers plan less, and individual raises within a company are usually spread around the budget according to performance and role.
WorldatWork also publishes a salary budget survey with base-salary increases and merit budgets, including detail for the United States. If you work in HR and need to benchmark a budget, comparing two or more independent surveys is better than relying on one.
A quick example
Suppose you earn $60,000 and your employer gives the median 3.5%. Your new salary is $62,100, a gain of $2,100 a year, or about $175 a month before taxes. If prices rise 3% over the same period, the real gain is about half a percentage point. In practical terms, you are barely ahead.
Do raises keep up with inflation?
This is the question most readers actually have. The honest answer for 2026 is: roughly break-even, and sometimes slightly behind.
The San Francisco Fed's October 2026 economic letter, What Do Financial Officers Predict for the Labor Market?, looks at surveys of chief financial officers. It notes a close historical relationship between what CFOs expect wages to do and what wages then do. Taken with comments from Federal Reserve advisers, the implication is that nominal pay will keep rising while purchasing power gains stay weak at best, because inflation is stabilizing but persistent.
The New York Fed's Liberty Street Economics blog makes a related point: wage growth has to be read through short-run swings to tell you anything about labor market tightness or price pressure. One hot or cold month is a poor guide.
For your own budget, compare your raise with the inflation rate you actually face. Housing, insurance and food can move differently from the headline index.
The "normalization" story
Economists describe 2026 as normalization. The volatile years of high inflation and rapid job switching are over, and pay growth is settling toward the roughly 3% pace that was typical before the pandemic. The San Francisco Fed piece frames it exactly this way: a move away from the high-inflation pandemic years toward older norms.
Federal Reserve advisers meeting in February 2026 expected slow but stable growth in 2026, broadly comparable to 2025, with little chance of a sharp acceleration or a contraction. For wages, that means no boom and no collapse.
Why raises are becoming selective
The same Federal Reserve advisory record describes a change in how employers spend their pay budgets. Rather than giving everyone a similar percentage, many are moving to what the record calls precision increases. They target in-demand roles, high performers and internal equity, which keeps total salary budgets in check.
For workers, this has practical consequences:
- Average raises hide a wide spread. A scarce-skill employee may get well above the median while others get less.
- Your case matters more than the headline. Documenting your results and what comparable roles pay gives you something concrete to bring to a review.
- Internal equity is a real factor. Employers compare you with colleagues at your level, not only with the outside market.
A low-hire, low-fire market
Advisers also describe a "low hire, low fire" environment. Businesses are keeping the staff they have, often by cross-training, optimizing internally and automating, rather than adding headcount. That makes it harder to find a new job unless you have specialized or credentialed skills in areas such as healthcare, skilled trades and AI-adjacent work.
This fits the Atlanta Fed data. Job switchers still earn bigger raises, but fewer openings means fewer people can take advantage of that.
Which sectors have room to raise pay
The February 2026 advisory record also points to differences across industries. Pricing power remains strong in professional services such as accounting and insurance, so those firms can absorb higher labor costs. Consumer retail and transportation face more price sensitivity, which squeezes margins and limits how much they can raise salaries.
| Sector type | Pricing power | Likely effect on pay |
|---|---|---|
| Professional services (accounting, insurance) | Strong | More room for raises |
| Consumer retail | Limited | Tighter pay budgets |
| Transportation | Limited | Tighter pay budgets |
| Healthcare, skilled trades, AI-adjacent roles | Demand-driven | Skills in short supply attract higher offers |
Minimum wages are rising on a different track
Minimum wage changes follow laws rather than the market. The federal minimum remains $7.25 an hour, but many states and cities set their own higher floors, and dozens of them adjust on January 1 or mid-year. If you work in or hire for low-wage jobs, check your state and city rules, because the local rate is the one that applies to you. Those increases can lift pay at the bottom of the scale even when the national median grows slowly.
What we think
We build Salary Atlas from US Bureau of Labor Statistics data, and wage trend coverage is where we are most cautious. A trend headline is easy to write and hard to verify. Many sites on salaries publish a percentage with no origin, or pull in self-reported or scraped numbers that skew toward whoever chose to post.
Our view is simple. A national wage growth figure tells you the weather, not your forecast. What decides your pay is the occupation, the state, where you sit in the percentile range and how long you have worked in the field. That is why we publish figures by job title, state and percentile, link each figure to its origin, and avoid inventing a trend when the data does not support one.
If you use any wage statistic for a real decision, such as an offer, a budget or a career choice, ask three questions. Who measured it? When? And does it describe a group that resembles you? If the page cannot answer, treat the number as a guess.
, Joelen Zyoktova
How to use wage trends in your own decisions
If you are job hunting
Start with the typical pay for your title in your state, not the national average. Then look at the percentile range. Entry-level offers sit near the lower percentiles, and experienced workers sit higher. Our guide to BLS salary data by job and state explains the difference between mean, median and percentiles, and why the median is usually the safer anchor.
With switchers earning more than stayers in the Atlanta Fed data, a new offer can be a reasonable lever if you have in-demand skills. In a low-hire market, however, do not count on it without a credential or specialty.
If you are negotiating a raise
The median planned increase is 3.5%, so asking for 3% is asking for the ordinary. If you have taken on more work or have scarce skills, a case for more is easier to make now that employers are directing money to specific roles. Bring the market range for your role and your own results.
If you are an employer or in HR
Budgeting near the 3.5% median keeps you in line with typical employers, but the evidence suggests that targeting matters more. Spend flexibly on roles where hiring is hard and on retention of strong performers, and rely on a source that names its data, date and sample.
If you are a student
Pick a field by looking at both pay and demand. A high salary in a field with few openings is a different bet from a moderate salary with strong growth. Our explanation of job outlook versus job growth shows how those two terms differ, which is easy to get wrong.
If you want to see how career trends are discussed in other markets, there is an Australian take on 2026 career trends to compare against. Remember that its pay context differs from US BLS data.
Wage data you can check yourself
We publish US wage figures drawn only from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with no paywall and no signup. Each figure links back to where it came from, and the data is refreshed annually. We do not use self-reported or scraped salaries, and we do not estimate values the BLS does not publish.
For a concrete example, our software developer salary page lays out the BLS median of $135,980, with percentiles and state detail. You can browse other occupations from the Salary Atlas home page.
What to watch for the rest of 2026
- The next Atlanta Fed update. If stayers fall further below 3.4%, raises are cooling faster than budgets suggested.
- Consumer prices. The gap between inflation and wage growth decides whether your pay buys more or less.
- Hiring conditions. Federal Reserve advisers expected consumer spending growth to soften as labor market conditions weaken, per the November 2025 record. Watch whether that happens.
- 2027 budget surveys. Next year's salary budget surveys will show whether employers hold at 3.5% or ease off.
FAQ
Are wages going to increase in 2026?
Yes, in nominal terms. Employers plan a median base-pay increase of 3.5%, and Federal Reserve advisers expect compensation growth in the 3% to 3.5% range. Whether your buying power rises depends on inflation, which has been persistent.
What is the expected pay raise in 2026?
The median planned raise is 3.5%, but individual raises vary widely. Employers are directing more money to in-demand roles and top performers, so your result may be above or below that midpoint.
Is 3% a good salary increase for 2026?
It is a little below the 3.5% median employer budget and close to the roughly 3% pace economists call normal. Whether it is good depends on inflation where you live and on how your pay compares with the market for your role. If prices are rising at a similar rate, you are roughly standing still.
Do people who change jobs still get bigger raises?
According to the Atlanta Fed tracker, yes. As of its October 8, 2026 update, switchers were at 4.7% and stayers at 3.4%. Fewer openings in a low-hire market make switching harder, though.
Sources
- US Salary Increase Budgets 2025-2026, The Conference Board
- Wage Growth Tracker, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
- What Do Financial Officers Predict for the Labor Market?, San Francisco Fed
- Federal Advisory Council record of meeting, February 5, 2026
- Federal Advisory Council record of meeting, November 20, 2025
- Nominal Wage Tracker, Economic Policy Institute
- Assessing the Current State of Wage Inflation, Liberty Street Economics
- 2026-2027 Salary Budget Survey, WorldatWork
Recommended
Occupation wage figures on Salary Atlas come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Figures in this article that are not linked to a source are estimates. See our methodology.